<     May 2017     >
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa  
    1  2  3  4  5  6  
 7  8  9 10 11 12 13  
14 15 16 17 18 19 20  
21 22 23 24 25 26 27  
28 29 30 31
00:00 <Shiz> if it's not building that's an issue somewhere in builder infra
00:01 <Shiz> http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/main/x86_64/py-larch-1.20131130-r0.apk
00:01 <Shiz> i see it appearing here just fine?
00:01 <Shiz> what arch are you seeing the issues on?
00:01 <tmh1999> it was on s390x
00:02 <Shiz> http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/main/s390x/py-larch-1.20131130-r0.apk
00:02 <Shiz> appears to be there
00:02 <tmh1999> i was checking nl.a.o ...
00:03 <tmh1999> thought that is the main repo
00:03 <Shiz> the main repo is rsync.
00:03 <Shiz> a.o
00:03 <Shiz> dl-cdn is a round-robin dns for the various mirrors
00:03 <Shiz> nl ceased being the main repo a while back
00:03 <Shiz> or i should say -- the main repo is wherever rsync.a.o points to
00:04 <Shiz> that's not necessarily its canonical name
00:04 <tmh1999> yeah dl-cdn is pretty random due to cdn. i didn't know about rsync.
00:05 <tmh1999> so community/obname on s390x is probably a builder thing. guess just poke ncopa since I cannot do anything about it
00:05 <Shiz> well, if it's on rsync it's not a builder thing
00:05 <tmh1999> it's on edge but on v3.6 no py-larch
00:05 <Shiz> aha
00:05 <Shiz> that's the thing i missed :p
00:06 <tmh1999> thank you Shiz :D
00:06 <Shiz> i wonder if the 3.6 builders just build from edge
00:06 <Shiz> there's no 3.6-stable branch yet
00:06 <tmh1999> I have no information about that since I don't have a touch on infra
00:07 <Shiz> likewise
00:07 <Shiz> :p
00:09 <tmh1999> :D
00:34 blueness joined
00:48 <arch3y_> I just pushed a pr to update flex to v2.6.4 and added its check funcs
01:32 BitL0G1c1 joined
01:51 s33se joined
02:16 gromero joined
03:49 tmh1999 joined
04:03 tmh1999 joined
05:06 <tmh1999> Hi ScrumpyJack, are you the maintainer of asciinema ?
05:06 blueness joined
05:08 <tmh1999> looks like asciinema has v1.3 and v1.4 out. Looks like it was rewritten by python (?) which fixes some bugs on s390x : https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema/issues/134.
05:18 fabled joined
05:27 fekepp joined
05:51 tmh1999 joined
06:37 t0mmy joined
06:51 tmh1999 joined
07:00 tmh1999 joined
07:22 tmh1999 joined
07:36 tty` joined
07:44 royger joined
07:47 tmh1999 joined
07:51 ashb joined
08:12 tmh1999 joined
08:21 Mr_H joined
08:36 tmh1999 joined
08:40 jakedt joined
08:43 ovf joined
09:01 tmh1999 joined
09:20 fekepp joined
09:22 gromero joined
09:28 tmh1999 joined
09:55 tmh1999 joined
10:19 tmh1999 joined
10:21 blueness joined
10:28 skarnet joined
10:46 tmh1999 joined
10:47 blueness joined
11:13 tmh1999 joined
11:41 tmh1999 joined
11:58 leitao joined
12:07 blueness joined
12:11 tmh1999 joined
12:15 <clandmeter> Shiz, did you manage to create a patch for syslogd?
12:19 clandmeter2 joined
12:26 clandmeter2 joined
12:32 <Shiz> clandmeter: yeah
12:32 <Shiz> there's a pr
12:32 <Shiz> https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/pull/1360
12:36 leo-unglaub joined
12:37 tmh1999 joined
12:52 FilippAndronov joined
12:52 <clandmeter2> _ikke_, around?
13:04 jnettlet joined
13:06 tmh1999 joined
13:09 <hiro> tmh1999: your network is fucked, youre spamming joins/quits
13:10 <scadu> that's why I love weechat's smart filters
13:11 <_ikke_> clandmeter2: tes
13:11 <_ikke_> yes
13:11 <clandmeter2> how is your status page?
13:11 <_ikke_> http://ikke.info/alpinelinux_status.png
13:11 <_ikke_> Everything looks alright
13:12 farosas joined
13:22 clandmeter joined
13:22 ncopa joined
13:22 clandmeter joined
13:23 FilippAndronov joined
13:24 FilippAndronov joined
13:33 tmh1999 joined
13:42 tmh1999 joined
14:21 Emperor_Earth joined
14:28 leo-unglaub joined
14:41 fabled joined
14:52 leo-unglaub joined
15:12 leo-unglaub joined
15:21 <clandmeter> Shiz, nice :)
15:21 <clandmeter> regarding syslogd
16:03 FilippAndronov joined
16:18 tru_tru joined
16:44 ^ingo^^^ joined
16:44 leo-unglaub joined
17:11 TemptorSent joined
17:12 czart__ joined
17:12 leitao_ joined
17:35 cyteen joined
18:06 stateless joined
18:14 leitao_ joined
18:30 LouisA joined
18:51 D630 joined
19:05 leitao_ joined
19:09 t0mmy joined
19:10 fekepp joined
19:43 FilippAndronov joined
20:04 minimalism joined
20:36 tkharju joined
21:04 martanne joined
21:05 FilippAndronov joined
21:31 <TBB> any thoughts on appimage and flatpak?
21:44 blueness joined
22:20 duncaen joined
22:39 duncaen joined
22:46 tmh1999_ joined
22:52 <TBB> okay, a short introduction to the two revealed at least that flatpak, being Red Hat, requires systemd. That alone pretty much turns me away from it.
22:53 <jirutka> TBB: IIRC flatpak does not require systemd
22:53 <jirutka> TBB: what I remember from talk about flatpak at FOSDEM
22:53 <Shiz> void packages flatpak without systemd
22:53 <Shiz> afaik
22:54 <jirutka> and we also have flatpak pkg, but don’t know in what state
22:58 <TBB> interesting. it says on the flatpak site they use systemd for setting up cgroups for sandboxes.
22:59 <jirutka> that doesn’t mean that it’s *required*
22:59 <TBB> true
23:11 <TBB> well well, it's past 2 am already, I'll probably research that a bit more tomorrow