<     May 2017     >
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa  
    1  2  3  4  5  6  
 7  8  9 10 11 12 13  
14 15 16 17 18 19 20  
21 22 _2_3 24 25 26 27  
28 29 30 31
00:41 djnym joined
00:55 bturker joined
01:17 djnym joined
02:06 bturker joined
02:19 petro__ joined
03:06 bturker joined
04:25 djnym joined
06:41 djnym joined
07:48 bturker joined
08:58 bturker joined
09:18 tombriden joined
09:59 bturker joined
10:42 djnym joined
11:00 bturker joined
11:03 andyt1 joined
11:04 Siyo joined
11:04 Siyo joined
11:25 djnym joined
11:39 Siyo joined
11:39 Siyo joined
12:00 bturker joined
12:59 codenamedmitri joined
13:01 bturker joined
14:02 bturker joined
14:22 peterhil joined
14:44 kota__ joined
15:03 bturker joined
15:08 kleptocroc- joined
15:24 bturker joined
15:45 craigav joined
15:47 churcho joined
15:49 <churcho> What is the best way to deal with limits on KV bucket retrieval? Is there a way to implement this using solr filters when using the erlang client? Does that mean the KV node would only get a request for n number of records as per the solr fetch query or it basically returns everything in the bucket and solr only gives n number of returned values?
16:24 bturker joined
16:33 churcho left
17:25 bturker joined
17:28 <russelldb> churcho: what are you trying to do?
17:33 bturker joined
18:33 bturker joined
19:34 bturker joined
19:45 churcho joined
19:46 churcho joined
19:54 andyt1 joined
20:18 Necromantic joined
20:30 Necro|senseless joined
20:31 Necro|senseless joined
20:35 bturker joined
20:40 kleptocroc- joined
20:43 Necromantic joined
21:09 codenamedmitri joined
21:43 bturker joined
22:17 bturker joined
22:20 kleptocroc- joined
23:18 bturker joined